Histologic Analysis of Ridge Preservation Using Deproteinized Porcine Bone: A Retrospective Human Study

Eun-Sik Park; Jeong-Cheol Park; Seong-Ho Choi; Dong-Woon Lee

doi:10.32542/implantology.2021001

All Issue

2021 Vol.25, Issue 1 Next Page

Original Article

Histologic Analysis of Ridge Preservation Using Deproteinized Porcine Bone: A Retrospective Human Study

31 March 2021. pp. 1-9

PDF XML

Abstract

Purpose: In this retrospective study a histomorphometric analysis was conducted of sites where alveolar ridge preservation was performed using deproteinized porcine bone mineral.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent ridge preservation after extraction were selected in this study. Histomorphometric analysis was performed according to the healing period (24 weeks) and socket location. The proportions of new bone, residual bone graft material, and fibrovascular tissue were calculated. The demographic characteristics of the two groups were compared using the t-test for continuous variables.

Results: The healing duration groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .692), residual graft (p = .875), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .619). The non-molar and molar area groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .999), residual graft (p = .638), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .723). The maxilla and mandible groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .185), residual graft (p = .736), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .125).

Conclusion: No significant differences were observed between the results of the histomorphometric analysis of the two groups based on the healing duration and location.

Keywords

Alveolar ridge augmentation

Bone regeneration

Histology

References

Barone A, Orlando B, Cingano L, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Covani U. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets:3-year results. J Periodontol 2012;83:836-46. 10.1902/jop.2011.11020522141358

Misch C, Suzuki J. Tooth extraction, socket grafting, and barrier membrane bone regeneration. Contemporary implant dentistry: St Louis (MI): Mosby Elsevier; 2008, p. 870-901.

Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-52. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x15882225

Horváth A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:341-63. 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-522814758

Chen ST, Jr TGW, Hammerle CHF. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:12-25. 15635942

Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M, Osteology Consensus G. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:80-2. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x22211307

Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1-21. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x22211303

Nair PR, Schug J. Observations on healing of human tooth extraction sockets implanted with bioabsorbable polylactic-polyglycolic acids (PLGA) copolymer root replicas: a clinical, radiographic, and histologic follow-up report of 8 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:559-69. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.013

Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Hayacibara R, Sukekava F, Lindhe J. Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced - augmented and non-augmented - defects in the alveolar ridge. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:435-40. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.x15842256

Boix D, Weiss P, Gauthier O, Guicheux J, Bouler J-M, Pilet P, et al. Injectable bone substitute to preserve alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: a study in dog. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:1145-52. 10.1007/s10856-006-0542-717122930PMC2042990

Clavero J, Lundgren S. Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation:comparison of donor site morbidity and complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:154-60. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00197.x14575631

Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-9. 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.99012931761

Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong M. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:39-66. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x22211305

Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:22-38. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.x22211304

Darby I. Periodontal materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56:107-18. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01301.x21564121

Mardas N, Trullenque‐Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N. Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4:Therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:180-201. 10.1111/clr.1263926078004

Cook DC, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using two different xenograft protocols. J Periodontol 2013;84:585-94. 10.1902/jop.2012.12021922680300

Gholami GA, Najafi B, Mashhadiabbas F, Goetz W, Najafi S. Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:1198-204. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02288.x22092485

Hoang TN, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different‐sized bone particles. J Periodontol 2012;83:174-81. 10.1902/jop.2011.11020921692633

Serrano Méndez CA, Lang NP, Caneva M, Ramírez Lemus G, Mora Solano G, Botticelli D. Comparison of allografts and xenografts used for alveolar ridge preservation. A clinical and histomorphometric RCT in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2017;19:608-15. 10.1111/cid.1249028466494

Koo TH, Song YW, Cha JK, Jung UW, Kim CS, Lee JS. Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020;31:93-102. 10.1111/clr.1355731724239

Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze‐dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-9. 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.99012931761

Leblebicioglu B, Salas M, Ort Y, Johnson A, Yildiz VO, Kim DG, et al. Determinants of alveolar ridge preservation differ by anatomic location. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:387-95. 10.1111/jcpe.1206523432761PMC4955554

De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:50-68. 10.1111/clr.1228827007188

Verdugo F, Laksmana T, D'Addona A, Uribarri A. Facial cortical bone regeneration post-extraction in non-grafted sockets allows for early implant placement and long-term functional stability. Arch Oral Biol 2020;112:104678. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2020.10467832062103

Turkyilmaz I, Sennerby L, McGlumphy EA, Tözüm TF. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:113-9. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00097.x18422713

Perelman-Karmon M, Kozlovsky A, Lilov R, Artzi Z. Socket site preservation using bovine bone mineral with and without a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32:458-65. 22577652

Nannmark U, Sennerby L. The bone tissue responses to prehydrated and collagenated cortico‐ cancellous porcine bone grafts: a study in rabbit maxillary defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:264-70. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00080.x18241216

Orsini G, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piccirilli M, Caputi S, Piattelli A. Histologic and ultrastructural analysis of regenerated bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using a porcine bone-derived biomaterial. J Periodontol 2006;77:1984-90. 10.1902/jop.2006.06018117209782

Barone A, Ricci M, Tonelli P, Santini S, Covani U. Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:1231-7. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02535.x22784417

Thalmair T, Fickl S, Schneider D, Hinze M, Wachtel H. Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques-a volumetric study. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:721-7. 10.1111/jcpe.1211123647007

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Implantology
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 25
No :1
Pages :1-9
Received Date : 2020-10-22
Revised Date : 2021-01-03
Accepted Date : 2021-01-05
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2021001

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue