Influence of Scan Body Exposure Height on Digital Impression Accuracy in Maxillary Anterior Implants: A Pilot Study

Dong Yeob Kang; Seung-rye Song

doi:10.32542/implantology.2026007

All Issue

2026 Vol.30, Issue 2 Preview Page Next Page

Original Article

Influence of Scan Body Exposure Height on Digital Impression Accuracy in Maxillary Anterior Implants: A Pilot Study

30 June 2026. pp. 86-97

PDF XML

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the influence of the supragingival scan body (SB) exposure height on the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions at maxillary anterior implant sites.

Materials and Methods: Digital impression datasets from two maxillary anterior implant sites were retrospectively analyzed. A Short SB scan was performed during the provisional restoration stage, whereas a Long SB scan was performed during the definitive restoration stage. A stone cast was fabricated from a provisional stage open-tray polyvinyl siloxane impression, and the same cast was digitized with each physical SB seated to generate condition-specific reference datasets. The iterative closest point (ICP) registration root mean square (RMS) error was recorded, and the linear deviation (LD) and angular deviation (AD) were obtained using Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC)-based cylinder fitting. Statistical analyses were not performed due to the single-patient design of the study.

Results: The mean supragingival SB exposure heights were 6.39 mm and 2.73 mm for the Long SB and Short SB conditions, respectively. The Long SB condition demonstrated lower ICP registration RMS error (29.8 µm) than the Short SB condition (70.4 µm). Mean LD values were 1.17 and 1.35 mm, and mean AD values were 0.85° and 3.68° for the Long SB and Short SB conditions, respectively.

Conclusion: In this retrospective single-patient pilot study, the dataset with reduced supragingival SB exposure height showed greater AD and higher ICP registration RMS errors at the maxillary anterior implant sites. Although no causal relationship can be established from these findings, the supragingival SB exposure height may warrant further investigation in relation to digital implant impression accuracy.

Keywords

Dental Implants

Dental Impression Technique

Dimensional Measurement Accuracy

Maxilla

Scan body

References

Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol 2009;80:140-51.

10.1902/jop.2009.080435

Buzayan MM, Yunus NB. Passive fit in screw retained multi-unit implant prosthesis understanding and achieving: a review of the literature. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014;14:16-23.

10.1007/s13191-013-0343-x24604993PMC3935037

Rutkūnas V, Gečiauskaitė A, Jegelevičius D, Vaitiekūnas M. Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10:101-20.

28944372

Revilla-León M, Lanis A, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Gallucci GO. Intraoral digital implant scans: parameters to improve accuracy. J Prosthodont 2023;32:150-64.

10.1111/jopr.13749

Park J, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. Complete mouth rehabilitation through integration of multi-source digital information: a case report. J Implantol Appl Sci 2023;27:141-9.

10.32542/implantology.2023016

Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1360-7.

10.1111/clr.12994

Kim GH, Park EJ, Cho YE. A comparison of scan data accuracy of implant scan body and encoded healing abutment. J Implantol Appl Sci 2024;28:32-41.

10.32542/implantology.2024004

Mohajerani R, Djalalinia S, Alikhasi M. The effects of scan body geometry on the precision and the trueness of implant impressions using intraoral scanners: a systematic review. Dent J (Basel) 2025;13:252.

10.3390/dj1306025240559155PMC12191632

Wu HK, Chen G, Huang X, Deng F, Li Y. Accuracy of single-implant digital impression with various scanbody exposure levels at anterior and posterior regions. J Dent 2023;138:104641.

10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104641

Petchmedyai P, Thanasrisuebwong P. Optimizing digital implant impressions: evaluating the significance of scan body image deficiency and alignment under varied scan body exposures. PLoS One 2023;18:e0291831.

10.1371/journal.pone.029183137733766PMC10513296

Mourouzis P. Critical methodological factors influencing the accuracy of intraoral scanners in digital dentistry research. Comput Biol Med 2025;187:109780.

10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109780

Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R, Ficuciello F, Lo Russo L, Esperouz F, Zarone F. A centripetally rotating implant scan body concept for complete-arch scanning: an in vitro study. J Dent 2026;169:106623.

10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106623

Moradi S, Laurendeau D, Gosselin C. Multiple cylinder extraction from organized point clouds. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:7630.

10.3390/s2122763034833706PMC8621001

Pan Y, Tsoi JKH, Lam WYH, Pow EHN. Implant framework misfit: a systematic review on assessment methods and clinical complications. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021;23:244-58.

10.1111/cid.12968

Jeong B, Lee Y, Hong SJ, Paek J, Noh K, Pae A, et al. Accuracy of implant digital scans with different intraoral scanbody shapes and library merging according to different oral exposure height. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:27-35.

10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.27

Choi YD, Lee KE, Mai HN, Lee DH. Effects of scan body exposure and operator on the accuracy of image matching of implant impressions with scan bodies. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:379.e1-6.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.004

Gómez-Polo M, Sallorenzo A, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Barmak AB, Att W, et al. Influence of implant angulation and clinical implant scan body height on the accuracy of complete arch intraoral digital scans. J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:119-27.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.018

Nam NE, Shin SH, Lim JH, Lee B, Shim JS, Kim JE. Accuracy of implant position reproduction according to exposed length of the scan body during optical scanning: an in vitro study. Appl Sci 2021;11:1689.

10.3390/app11041689

Lee JH, Jo JS, Lee SY. Digital impression accuracy for bone-level and tissue-level implants using scan bodies of different heights. Sci Rep 2025;15:37367.

10.1038/s41598-025-20524-641145637PMC12559281

Sicilia E, Lagreca G, Papaspyridakos P, Finkelman M, Cobo J, Att W, et al. Effect of supramucosal height of a scan body and implant angulation on the accuracy of intraoral scanning: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:1126-34.

10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.018

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 30
No :2
Pages :86-97
Received Date : 2026-06-01
Revised Date : 2026-06-24
Accepted Date : 2026-06-27
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2026007

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue