All Issue

2016 Vol.20, Issue 3 Preview Page
October 2016. pp. 152-159
Abstract
References
1
Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, et al. A systematic review of postextractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 5: 1-21.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x22211303
2
Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17: 21-27.
10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7
3
Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32: 212-218.
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x
4
Jin SH, Park JB, Kim N, et al. The thickness of alveolar bone at the maxillary canine and premolar teeth in normal occlusion. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012; 42: 173-178.
10.5051/jpis.2012.42.5.17323185698PMC3498302
5
Vera C, De Kok IJ, Reinhold D, et al. Evaluation of buccal alveolar bone dimension of maxillary anterior and premolar teeth: a cone beam computed tomography investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1514-1519.
23189304
6
Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, et al. Relationship between the buccal bone plate thickness and the healing of postextraction sockets with/without ridge preservation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34: 211-217.
10.11607/prd.188524600657
7
Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, et al. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32: 421-430.
22577648
8
Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, et al. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40: 90-98.
10.1111/jcpe.1202723163915
9
Kim DM, De Angelis N, Camelo M, et al. Ridge preservation with and without primary wound closure: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 71-78.
10.11607/prd.146323342349
10
Kim JH, Susin C, Min JH, et al. Extraction sockets: erratic healing impeding factors. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41: 80-85.
10.1111/jcpe.1217324117498
11
Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, et al. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 950-958.
10.1177/002203451454112724966231PMC4293706
12
Willenbacher M, Al-Nawas B, Berres M, et al. The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015. doi: 10.1111/cid.12364. [Epub ahead of print]
10.1111/cid.12364
13
Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, et al. Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: Therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 Suppl 11: 180-201.
10.1111/clr.1263926078004
14
Horowitz R, Holtzclaw D, Rosen PS. A review on alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012; 12(3 Suppl): 149-160.
10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70029-5
15
Horváth A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17: 341-363.
10.1007/s00784-012-0758-522814758
16
De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 50-68.
10.1111/clr.1228827007188
17
Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 9-13.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01937.x21091539
18
Beck TM, Mealey BL. Histologic analysis of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized human bone allograft. J Periodontol. 2010; 81: 1765-1772.
10.1902/jop.2010.10028620653437
19
Hoang TN, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different-sized bone particles. J Periodontol. 2012; 83: 174-181.
10.1902/jop.2011.11020921692633
20
Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos GE, Alexandre Gerhke S, et al. Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation: animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016. doi: 10.1111/clr.12942. [Epub ahead of print]
10.1111/clr.12942
21
Wang HL, Boyapati L. "PASS" principles for predictable bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 2006; 15: 8-17.
10.1097/01.id.0000204762.39826.0f16569956
22
Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, et al. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 1124-1132.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01744.x19508339
23
Kozlovsky A, Aboodi G, Moses O, et al. Bio-degradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) applied in a double-layer technique in rats. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 1116-1123
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01740.x19719734
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 20
  • No :3
  • Pages :152-159
  • Received Date : 2016-08-19
  • Revised Date : 2016-08-25
  • Accepted Date : 2016-08-26