Survey of Sinus Floor Augmentation Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

Ikhyeon Kim; Seunghun Baek; Kang-Min Ahn

doi:10.32542/implantology.2025014

All Issue

2025 Vol.29, Issue 3 Preview Page Next Page

Original Article

Survey of Sinus Floor Augmentation Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

30 September 2025. pp. 133-143

PDF XML

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the clinical preferences of experienced Korean oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS) regarding lateral sinus augmentation.

Materials and Methods: A structured 12-item multiple-choice questionnaire was distributed to 42 OMFS in Korea, aged 36‒57 years, all with >10 years of clinical experience and working in university hospitals. The survey assessed key aspects of lateral sinus augmentation, including annual case volume, residual bone height (RBH) thresholds, instrument preferences, implant timing in low-bone conditions, graft material selection, use of growth factors, healing periods, membrane perforation management, preferred implant types, and attitudes toward smoking and alcohol use.

Results: Among 42 respondents, 28 (66.7%) reported performing 1‒50 sinus grafts per year. For lateral sinus approach initiation, the most common threshold was 4 mm RBH (17/42, 40.5%), followed by 3 mm (12/42, 28.6%). The most preferred instrument for lateral wall osteotomy was the low-speed carbide or diamond bur (29/42, 69.0%), with piezoelectric devices being the second most common choice. Regarding simultaneous implant placement when RBH <3 mm, 25 respondents (59.5%) reported proceeding with placement, whereas 17 (40.5%) preferred staged procedures. Xenografts were the most frequently used graft material (17/42, 40.5%), often in combination with others. Only six clinicians (14.3%) reported using BMP-2 or similar biologics. The most preferred healing period was 6 months (14/42, 33.3%), followed by 5 (5/42, 11.9%) and 3 (5/42, 11.9%) months. For large sinus membrane perforation (>1 cm), 24 respondents (57.1%) repaired and proceeded, whereas 15 (35.7%) decided based on the case. The most common membrane repair method was the use of absorbable membranes (32/42, 76.2%). Internal connection implants were the most widely adopted system (35/42, 83.3%). For smoking patients, 14 respondents (33.3%) performed surgery regardless of cessation, whereas a similar number recommended cessation prior to surgery. Regarding alcohol intake, 18 respondents (42.9%) recommended temporary abstinence, whereas 17 (40.5%) did not consider it a considerable factor.

Conclusion: Korean OMFS tend to prefer simultaneous implant placement, even with RBH <3 mm, particularly when using xenografts, to minimize surgical stages. Smoking cessation is commonly emphasized, whereas attitudes toward alcohol are more lenient. These findings reflect evolving practices within existing protocols and underscore the need for broader, multidisciplinary research to establish a more comprehensive clinical consensus on sinus augmentation.

Keywords

Autografts

Dental implant

Sinus floor augmentation

Surgeons

Surveys

Xenografts

References

Uckan S, Tamer Y, Deniz K. Survival rates of implants inserted in the maxillary sinus area by internal or external approach. Implant Dent 2011;20:476-9.

10.1097/ID.0b013e3182386d34

Kim DH, Ko MJ, Lee JH, Jeong SN. A radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus augmentation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2018;48:174-81.

10.5051/jpis.2018.48.3.17429984047PMC6031761

Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Lim SC. Analysis of the healing process in sinus bone grafting using various grafting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:204-11.

10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.021

Soler-Alcaraz S, Guerrero-Sanchez Y, Del Aguila OG, Bernabeu-Mira JC, Camacho-Alonso F. Analysis of bone quality formation in sinus lifts with immediate implants. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:1214.

10.1186/s12903-024-04953-939402523PMC11472588

Virnik S, Cueni L, Kloss-Brandstatter A. Is one-stage lateral sinus lift and implantation safe in severely atrophic maxillae? Results of a comparative pilot study. Int J Implant Dent 2023;9:6.

10.1186/s40729-023-00471-536806674PMC9939565

Sonoda T, Yamamichi K, Harada T, Yamamichi N. Effect of staged crestal maxillary sinus augmentation: A case series. J Periodontol 2020;91:194-201.

10.1002/JPER.18-063231365130PMC7065142

Gracia A, Jensen OT, Kurtzman GM. A review of sinus floor elevation techniques: lateral window, transcrestal, graft materials, and biologics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2024;45:418-26.

39276791

Khijmatgar S, Del Fabbro M, Tumedei M, Testori T, Cenzato N, Tartaglia GM. Residual bone height and new bone formation after maxillary sinus augmentation procedure using biomaterials: A network meta-analysis of clinical trials. Materials (Basel) 2023;16.

10.3390/ma1604137636837005PMC9962504

Gutwald R, Haberstroh J, Stricker A, Ruther E, Otto F, Xavier SP, et al. Influence of rhBMP-2 on bone formation and osseointegration in different implant systems after sinus-floor elevation. An in vivo study on sheep. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:571-9.

10.1016/j.jcms.2010.02.010

Han JJ, Moon JE, Lee EH, Yang HJ, Hwang SJ. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implant after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with rhBMP-2/hydroxyapatite compared to deproteinized bovine bone. PLoS One 2022;17:e0273399.

10.1371/journal.pone.027339936007001PMC9409565

Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:497-506.

10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00571.x

Nolan PJ, Freeman K, Kraut RA. Correlation between Schneiderian membrane perforation and sinus lift graft outcome: a retrospective evaluation of 359 augmented sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:47-52.

10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.020

Joung WJ, Yun SH, Kim Y, Cho YS, Lee WW, Seo JW, et al. Intra-sinus rigid fixation of a resorbable barrier membrane to repair a large perforation of the sinus membrane: a technical note. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023;49:297-303.

10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.5.29737907346PMC10618659

Kim YK, Hwang JW, Yun PY. Closure of large perforation of sinus membrane using pedicled buccal fat pad graft: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1139-42.

19216286

Barbato L, Baldi N, Gonnelli A, Duvina M, Nieri M, Tonelli P. Association of Smoking Habits and Height of Residual Bone on Implant Survival and Success Rate in Lateral Sinus Lift: A Retrospective Study. J Oral Implantol 2018;44:432-8.

10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00192

Galindo-Moreno P, Moreno-Riestra I, Avila-Ortiz G, Padial-Molina M, Gallas-Torreira M, Sanchez-Fernandez E, et al. Predictive factors for maxillary sinus augmentation outcomes: a case series analysis. Implant Dent 2012;21:433-40.

10.1097/ID.0b013e3182691959

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 29
No :3
Pages :133-143
Received Date : 2025-06-25
Revised Date : 2025-09-19
Accepted Date : 2025-09-20
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2025014

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue