All Issue

2017 Vol.21, Issue 4 Preview Page
Computer-guided Flapless Implant Surgery and Immediate Loading with Customized Restoration, Comparing and Reviewing Error of Guided Surgery

무피판 가이드 수술을 이용한 임플란트 즉시 수복 증례와 시스템 고찰

Ju Whan Lee1*
이 주환1*
1Yonsei Samsung Dental Clinic
1연세삼성치과의원
*Corresponding Author. 
December 2017. pp. 225-249
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

The aim of this case report is to show the result of computer-guided flapless implant surgery with immediate loading and compare the difference between the two guided implant system. When using the guided surgery, minimally invasive surgery and predictable results are available. However, myth about the treatment can lead to a tragedy and be even useless. Before we approach the method, certain elements should be aware of and be controlled to maximize the advantages of it.

Keywords
Computer-guided flapless implant surgery
Customized restoration
Guided surgery,Immediate loading

References
1
Hanzelka T, Dusek J, Ocasek F, et al. Movement of the patient and cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 116: 769-773.
10.1016/j.oooo.2013.08.01024237728
2
Hack G, Patzelt S. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: An in-vitro investigation. ADA 2015; 10: 1-5.
3
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, et al. Digital versus conventional impression in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 184-190.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.01726946916
4
D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14: 321-335.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x20491822
5
Park J, Heo S, Park E. Comparative study on clearance between drilling and bushing of various implant guide systems. Implantology. 2014; 18: 194-202.
6
Gallucci GO, Benic GI, Eckert SE, et al. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl: 287-290.
10.11607/jomi.2013.g4
7
Nkenke E, Fenner M. Indications for immediate loading of implants and implant success. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17 Suppl 2: 19-34.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01348.x16968379
8
Huang HL, Chang YY, Lin DJ, et al. Initial stability and bone strain evaluation of the immediately loaded dental implant: an in vitro model study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 691-698.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01983.x21054551
9
Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, et al. Relationship between the bone density estimated by conebeam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 832-836.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x21545533
10
Pauwels R, Nackaerts O, Bellaiche N, et al. Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations. Br J Radiol. 2013; 86: 20120135.
10.1259/bjr.2012013523255537PMC4651064
11
Dolcini GA, Colombo M, Mangano C, et al. From guided surgery to final prosthesis with a fully digital procedure: a prospective clinical study on 15 partially edentulous patients. Int J Dent. 2016; 2016: 7358423.
10.1155/2016/735842327493665PMC4963589
12
De Bruyn H, Raes S, Ostman PO, et al. Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines. Periodontol 2000. 2014; 66: 153-187.
10.1111/prd.1204025123767
13
Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U, et al. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 867-875.
19014156
14
Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computerassisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34: 1-8.
10.1016/j.ijom.2004.03.01815617960
15
Kupeyan HK, Shaffner M, Armstrong J. Definitive CAD/CAM-guided prosthesis for immediate loading of bone-grafted maxilla: a case report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006; 8: 161-167.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00018.x16919024
16
Wong NY, Huffer-Charchut H, Sarment DP. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guidance for placement of dental implants: case report. Implant Dent. 2007; 16: 123-130.
10.1097/ID.0b013e31805008d317563502
17
Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, et al. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28: 105-111.
10.1038/sj.dmfr.460041910522199
18
Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, et al. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13: 651-656.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130612.x12519341
19
Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 709-716.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01430.x
20
Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 234-242.
19492638
21
Van Assche N, Van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34: 816-821.
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01110.x17716317
22
Eggers G, Patellis E, Mühling J. Accuracy of template-based dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 447-454.
19587866
23
Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery--a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 305-313.
16634503
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 21
  • No :4
  • Pages :225-249
  • Received Date : 2017-12-05
  • Revised Date : 2017-12-12
  • Accepted Date : 2017-12-18
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implant.20170018
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close