All Issue

2017 Vol.21, Issue 2 Preview Page
A Review of the Digital Impression Taking Technique of Implants by Using a Coded Healing Abutment

코딩된 치유 지대주를 이용한 디지털 방식의 임플란트 인상채득 방법에 대한 고찰

Kyung Chul Oh1
,
Jong-Eun Kim2*
,
Jongyub Kim2
오 경철1
,
김 종은2*
,
김 종엽2
1Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University
2Boston SMart Dental Clinic
1연세대학교 치과대학 보철과학교실
2보스톤스마트치과의원
*Corresponding Author. 
June 2017. pp. 128-136
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Conventional implant-level impression techniques required removal of healing abutments at least twice until the placement of definitive restorations. The use of coded healing abutments may simplify this procedure since they provide information necessary to design implant abutments such as implant hex position and platform diameter. This could minimize periimplant tissue irritation and reduce the laboratory time and costs when used in combination with an intraoral scanner. The aims of this article were to describe the structure, clinical availability, and limitations of the coded healing abutments and review the studies related to their use.

Keywords
Coded healing abutment
Digital impression
Healing abutment-level impression
Intraoral scanner
Peri-implant tissue irritation

References
1
Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont. 2015; 24: 313-321.
10.1111/jopr.1221825220390
2
Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139: 761-763.
10.14219/jada.archive.2008.025818520000
3
Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, et al. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 648-653.
10.1111/clr.1285327150731
4
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1997; 24: 568-572.
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00230.x9266344
5
Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 22-32.
10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.15816125013
6
Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. The use of a coded healing abutment as an impression coping to design and mill an individualized anatomic abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011; 105: 282-285.
10.1016/S0022-3913(11)00056-4
7
Eliasson A, Ortorp A. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14(Suppl 1): e30-38. Abduo J, Chen C, Le Breton E, et al. The effect of coded healing abutments on treatment duration and clinical outcome: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing encode and conventional impression protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017.
8
Al-Abdullah K, Zandparsa R, Finkelman M, et al. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110: 90-100.
10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7
9
Ng SD, Tan KB, Teoh KH, et al. Three-dimensional accuracy of a digitally coded healing abutment implant impression system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 927-936.
10.11607/jomi.343325032774
10
Nayyar N, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E. Using digitally coded healing abutments and an intraoral scanner to fabricate implant-supported, cement-retained restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 210-215.
10.1016/S0022-3913(13)00073-5
11
Vafiadis D, Goldstein G, Garber D, et al. Immediate implant placement of a single central incisor using a CAD/CAM crown-root form technique: provisional to final restoration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 29: 13-21.
10.1111/jerd.1226527673748
12
Carpentieri JR, Lazzara RJ. A simplified impression protocol for fabrication of anatomical, cementretained CAD/CAM abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34(Suppl 3): s19-25.
24956087
13
Dhima M. Correction of bone and softtissue deformity of the single implant in the aesthetic zone: a case treated with alveolar ridge preservation, modified roll technique and a digitally coded healing abutment. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2014; 22: 51-55.
25134361
14
Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, et al. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19: 2027-2034.
10.1007/s00784-015-1430-725693497
15
Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, et al. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 465-472.
10.1111/clr.1256725682892
16
Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, et al. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 283-289.
10.1007/s00784-015-1513-526121970
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 21
  • No :2
  • Pages :128-136
  • Received Date : 2017-06-12
  • Revised Date : 2017-06-19
  • Accepted Date : 2017-06-19
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20170010
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close