Evaluation of Linear and Volumetric Changes in Bone Grafts after Sinus Floor Elevation using a Lateral Approach

Yeon-Jae Lee; Sung-Jo Lee

doi:10.32542/implantology.2022006

All Issue

2022 Vol.26, Issue 2 Next Page

Original Article

Evaluation of Linear and Volumetric Changes in Bone Grafts after Sinus Floor Elevation using a Lateral Approach

30 June 2022. pp. 73-83

PDF XML

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the volume, height, and mesiodistal length of the bone graft material after maxillary sinus elevation using the lateral approach by performing virtual three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the bone graft.

Materials and Methods: Eleven patients underwent maxillary sinus elevation using the lateral approach in 11 cases. In all patients, deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) was used as the bone graft material, and the window formed on the side wall of the maxillary sinus was covered with a collagen membrane. Immediately after surgery (T1) and an average of 5.81 ± 1.40 months after surgery (T2), CBCT was taken and the absorption volume, height, and mesio-distal width of the graft material were measured at two time points. At T1 and T2, the average bone graft material volumes were 3,864 ± 698 mm³ and 2,878 ± 350 mm³, respectively.

Results: The volume of the bone graft material decreased by an average of 21.8%, showing a statistically significant difference. The average height of the bonegraft material was measured to be 14.4 ± 2.83 mm in T1 and 13.19 ± 1.47 mm in T2 , but it was not statistically significant. After maxillary sinus elevation using the lateral approach, the volume of grafted bone decreases over time. The rate of absorption of the bone graft material at an average of 5.81 months after surgery was measured to be 21.8%.

Conclusion: There was no significant decrease in the height of the bone graft material at an average of six months after surgery. These results indicate that DBBM is a reliable and predictable material for maxillary sinus elevation.

Keywords

Maxillary sinus

Sinus floor augmentation

3D reconstruction

References

Graziani F, Donos N, Needleman I, Gabriele M, Tonetti M. Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:677-82. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01116.x15533128

Emmrich D, Att W, Stappert C. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Periodontol 2005;76:1237-51. 10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.123716101354

Riben C, Thor A. The maxillary sinus membrane elevation procedure: augmentation of bone around dental implants without grafts-a review of a surgical technique. Int J Dent 2012;2012:105483. 10.1155/2012/10548322754569PMC3383004

Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-77. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.02415626319

Maddalone M, Mirabelli L, Venino PM, Karanxha L, Porcaro G, Del FabbroM. Long-term stability of autologous bone graft of intraoral origin after lateral sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant placement. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:713-21. 10.1111/cid.1264930144262

Cordioli G, Mazzocco C, Schepers E, Brugnolo E, Majzoub Z. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:270-8. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012003270.x11359485

Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:263-73. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02168.x21443592

Jensen SS, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjørting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:55-66. 10.7202/037238ar8820123

Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:835-40. 10612920

Jensen T, Schou S, Svendsen PA. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:902-10. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02245.x22044477

Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A. Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:881-92. 10.11607/jomi.347225032768

Hürzeler MB, Kirsch A, Ackermann KL, Quiñones CR. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus : a 5-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:466-75. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00066.x16336912

Kirmeier R, Payer M, Wehrschuetz M, Jakse N, Platzer S, Lorenzoni M. Evaluation of three‐dimensional changes after sinus floor augmentation with different grafting materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:366-72. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01487.x18324958

Mazzocco F, Lops D, Gobbato L, Lolato A, Romeo E, Del Fabbro M. Three-dimensional volume change of grafted bone in the maxillary sinus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:178-84. 10.11607/jomi.323624451869

Umanjec-Korac S, Wu G, Hassan B, Liu Y, Wismeijer D. A retrospective analysis of the resorption rate of deproteinized bovine bone as maxillary sinus graft material on cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:781-5. 10.1111/clr.1217423594078

Dellavia C, Speroni S, Pellegrini G, Gatto A, Maiorana C. A new method to evaluate volumetric changes in sinus augmentation procedure. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16:684-90. 10.1111/cid.1205823509966

Kim ES, Moon SY, Kim SG, Park HC, Oh JS. Three-dimensional volumetric analysis after sinus grafts. Implant Dentistry 2013;22:170-4. 10.1097/ID.0b013e31827f357623399787

Kühl S, Payer M, Kirmeier R, Wildburger A, Wegscheider W, Jakse N. The influence of bone marrow aspirates and concentrates on the early volume stability of maxillary sinus grafts with deproteinized bovine bone mineral-first results of a RCT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:221-5. 10.1111/clr.1210123294470

Sbordone C, Toti P, Guidetti F, Califano L, Bufo P. Volume changes of autogenous bone after sinus lifting and grafting procedures: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:235-41. 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.09.00723084768

Gultekin BA, Cansiz E, Borahan O, Mangano C, Kolerman R, Mijiritsky E, et al. Evaluation of volumetric changes of augmented maxillary sinus with different bone grafting biomaterials. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:144-8. 10.1097/SCS.000000000000239326890457

Orsini G, Traini T, Scarano A, Degidi M, Perrotti V, Piccirilli M, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with Bio‐Oss^® particles: A light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy study in man. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;74:448-57. 10.1002/jbm.b.3019615889429

Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:503-6. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01672.x19250241

Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:323-35. 10.1259/dmfr/1960330420729181PMC3520236

Mordenfeld A, Lindgren C, Hallman M. Sinus floor augmentation using straumann bone ceramic and bio-oss in a split mouth design and later placement of implants: a 5-year report from longitudinal study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2016;18:926-36. 10.1111/cid.1237426358740

Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-45. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x15142097

Starch-Jensen T, Aludden H, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Christensen AE, Mordenfeld A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:103-16. 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.00128545806

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 26
No :2
Pages :73-83
Received Date : 2022-03-17
Revised Date : 2022-03-25
Accepted Date : 2022-03-25
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2022006

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue