Effects of Striking and Bone Conditions on Damping Capacity Assessment: An in vitro Study

Dae-Young Kang; Hyeon-Seong Ahn; Hyun-Seung Shin; In-Woo Cho

doi:10.32542/implantology.2023009

All Issue

2023 Vol.27, Issue 2 Next Page

Original Article

Effects of Striking and Bone Conditions on Damping Capacity Assessment: An in vitro Study

30 June 2023. pp. 75-86

PDF XML

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the changes in damping capacity according to the striking and bone conditions of implants placed in a porcine rib using two devices (Periotest; Medizintechnik and AnyCheck; Neobiotech).

Materials and Methods: In the first experiment, 20 implant fixtures were placed on porcine ribs and connected at three healing abutment heights (3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 mm). The damping capacities were measured in different vertical angles (0° and +30°) and horizontal directions (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, and distobuccal). The second experiment involved 20 implant fixtures placed on the porcine ribs for bone dehiscence, where the damping capacity was measured only in different horizontal directions (mesiobuccal, midbuccal, and lingual).

Results: In the first experiment, lower stability values were observed with higher healing abutment heights and lower vertical angles (p < .05). The horizontal striking direction did not show a difference in the damping capacity value of implants surrounded by intact bone (p > .05) but showed a significant difference in implants with buccal dehiscence defects (p < .05).

Conclusion: Striking direction and peri-implant bone conditions can affect Periotest and AnyCheck values. To obtain reproducible values, it is necessary to assess the damping capacity according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Keywords

Dental implants

Diagnostic techniques and procedures

Osseointegration

Percussion

References

Brånemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson Å. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100. 10.3109/028443169090366994924041

Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59. https://dentalimplantat.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/article-branemark.pdf

Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-92. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x15248872

Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:425-31. 15973954

Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, Romanos GE. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci 2013;5:162-7. 10.1556/imas.5.2013.4.324381734PMC3873594

Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to- implant contact on machine-prepared roughened titanium and dental implants: A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:202-6. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050402.x7640333

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric study of screw-shaped and removal torque titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x7669864

Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: Biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x18412573

Swami V, Vijayaraghavan V, Swami V. Current trends to measure implant stability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:124-30. 10.4103/0972-4052.17653927141160PMC4837777

Aparicio C. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:150-61. 9497709

Cranin AN, DeGrado J, Kaufman M, Baraoidan M, DiGregorio R, Batgitis G, et al. Evaluation of the Periotest as a diagnostic tool for dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1998;24:139-46. 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0139:EOTPAA>2.3.CO;29893520

Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: Current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54. 17974108

Faulkner MG, Wolfaardt JF, Chan A. Measuring abutment/implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:681-8. 10531740

Olivé J, Aparicio C. The Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:390-400. 2094658

Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D. Periotest: An objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:55-61. 1843494

Morris HF, Ochi S, Crum P, Orenstein I, Plezia R. Bone density: Its influence on implant stability after uncovering. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:263-9. 10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0263:BDIIOI>2.3.CO;214719574

Faulkner MG, Giannitsios D, Lipsett AW, Wolfaardt JF. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:486-94. 11515995

Søballe K, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Hansen ES, Bünger C. Hydroxyapatite coating modifies implant membrane formation: controlled micromotion studied in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63:128-40. 10.3109/174536792091548081590045

Soballe K, Hansen ES, Brockstedt-Rasmussen H, Bunger C. Hydroxyapatite coating converts fibrous tissue to bone around loaded implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:270-8. 10.1302/0301-620X.75B2.84449498444949

Szmukler‐Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001012.x11168189

Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. Validation of value of actual micromotion as a direct measure of implant micromobility after healing (secondary implant stability). An in vivo histologic and biomechanical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:1423-30. 10.1111/clr.1275626727557

Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant‐tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x9151590

Pattijn V, Jaecques SV, De Smet E, Muraru L, Van Lierde C, Van der Perre G, et al. Resonance frequency analysis of implants in the guinea pig model: Influence of boundary conditions and orientation of the transducer. Med Eng Phys 2007;29:182-90. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.02.01016597507

Lachmann S, Laval JY, Axmann D, Weber H. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: An in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:347-55. 21483888

Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:2-7. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x16968377

Vidyasagar L, Apse P. Dental implant design and biological effects on bone-implant interface. Stomatologija 2004;6:51-4. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Dental-Implant-Design-and-Biological-Effects-on-Vidyasagar-Apse/1c07a093050386eff883a729a7e1081287fa8d14

Santamaría-Arrieta G, Brizuela-Velasco A, Fernández-González FJ, Chávarri-Prado D, Chento-Valiente Y, Solaberrieta E, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2016;8:e307-11. 10.4317/jced.5287327398182PMC4930641

Kao HC, Gung YW, Chung TF, Hsu ML. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: A 3-D finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:347-55. 18807557

Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: Considerations based on a three‐dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:401-12. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01022.x15248874

Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent 1992;1: 289-94. 10.1097/00008505-199200140-000111298504

Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-6. 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90325-72362246

Merheb J, Coucke W, Jacobs R, Naert I, Quirynen M. Influence of bony defects on implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:919-23. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01932.x20491838

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 27
No :2
Pages :75-86
Received Date : 2023-06-02
Revised Date : 2023-06-28
Accepted Date : 2023-06-28
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2023009

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue