Evaluation of Dental Implant Stability with or without Photoactivated Surface Treatment

Yu-ri Heo; Jaeseok Kang; Mee-Kyoung Son

doi:10.32542/implantology.2021006

All Issue

2021 Vol.25, Issue 2 Next Page

Original Article

Evaluation of Dental Implant Stability with or without Photoactivated Surface Treatment

30 June 2021. pp. 57-63

PDF XML

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the stability of two implant groups treated either only with sandblasting and acid etching or photoactivation af ter sandblasting and acid etching, using resonance f requency analysis (RFA).

Materials and Methods: We investigated 50 implants in 25 patients (12 men and 13 women). Twenty-five implants were treated with sandblasting and acid etching, and 25 with photoactivation. We recorded the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value on the day of implant placement and consecutively every 2 weeks f or 16 weeks f or each implant. RFA was used f or the direct measurement of implant stability. We compared mean ISQ values using a repeated-measures analysis of variance test.

Results: The mean ISQ values at surgery and 16 weeks in implants treated only with sandblasting and acid etching were 77.8 ± 6.7 and 83.2 ± 2.5, respectively, while in those treated with f urther photoactivation were 78.9 ± 5.3 and 84.1 ± 3.3, respectively. The photoactivated implants showed higher ISQ values than those without photoactivated surface treatment. However, there were no significant differences between the two implant groups.

Conclusion: Both implant groups showed high implant stability in clinical practice. The photoactivated implant surf ace appears to have higher implant stability than that without photoactivation by increasing the hydrophilic surface.

Keywords

Dental implants

Implant stability

Implant stability quotient

Osseointegration

Resonance f requency analysis

References

Albreksson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.

Eriksson C, Lausmaa J, Nygren H. Interactions between human whole blood and modified TiO 2 -surfaces: influence of surface topography and oxide thickness on leukocyte adhesion and activation. Biomaterials 2001;22:1987-96. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00382-3

Lee YJ, Lee BU, Kim YS. Current studies of implant surface treatment in perspective of bone healing mechanism. Implantology 2003;12:12-29. 10.1097/01.ID.0000086481.84152.4214752964

Kilpadi DV, Lemons JE. Surface energy characterization of unalloyed titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;28:1419-25. 10.1002/jbm.8202812067876280

Kim C, Kendall MR, Miller MA, Long CL, Larson PR, Humphrey MB, et al. Comparison of titanium soaked in 5 M NaOH or 5 M KOH solutions. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2013;33:327-39. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.08.04723565038PMC3613859

Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:605-11. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x20666787

Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler MS, Bernard JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:529-39. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x15355394

Boronat LA, Balaguer MJ, Lamas PJ, Carrillo GC, Penarrocha DM. Resonance frequency analysis of dental implant stability during the healing period. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E244-7.

Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:641-51.

Ersanli S, Karabuda C, Beck F, Leblebicioglu B. Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period. J Periodontol 2005;76:1066-71. 10.1902/jop.2005.76.7.106616018748

Branemark R, Ohrnell LO, Skalak R, Carlsson L, Branemark PI. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res 1998;16:61-9. 10.1002/jor.11001601119565075

Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:338-47. 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x19438966

Valderrama P, Oates TW, Jones AA, Simpson J, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Evaluation of two different resonance frequency devices to detect implant stability: a clinical trial. J Periodontol 2007;78:262-72. 10.1902/jop.2007.06014317274715

Ramón S, Pablo V, Felipe C. Effect of macro-design in the primary stability of short and extra-short implants using resonance frequency analysis. An ex vivo study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10:603-7. 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.08.02032953443PMC7486604

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 25
No :2
Pages :57-63
Received Date : 2021-03-10
Revised Date : 2021-06-08
Accepted Date : 2021-06-17
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2021006

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue