All Issue

2021 Vol.25, Issue 4

Original Article

Clinical Precautions for Implant Placement using Computer-guided Implant Surgical Guide: A Systematic Review
Jae-Hwi Bae1
,
Su-Young Lee2*
1Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul St. Mary’s Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
2Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul St. Mary’s Dental Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
*Corresponding Author
31 December 2021. pp. 147-157
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to review the literature related to implant deviations that may occur when using a computer-guided implant surgical guide and to consider clinical precautions to reduce these deviations when placing implants using a computer-guided implant surgical guide.

Materials and Methods: Articles published between 2010 and 2020 were searched in PubMed according to custom criteria. The selected articles were classif ied according to the cause of the deviation, and the degree of the deviation was analyzed.

Results: Twelve articles were included based on the selection criteria. During implant surgery using a computer-guided implant surgical guide, various implant deviations were observed depending on the implant location, sleeve, drill, implant system, residual teeth, and 3D printer type.

Conclusion: Deviations in implant placement can occur even when computer-guided implant surgical guide are used. It is necessary to recognize the possibility of implant deviations occurring according to various clinical situations and attempt to reduce these deviations.

Keywords
Accuracy
computer-guided implant surgical guide
Dental implant
Deviation
Guided implant surgery
References
1
Verde MA, Morgano SM. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:276-80. 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90106-X
2
Sommacal B, Savic M, Filippi A, Kühl S, Thieringer FM. Evaluation of two 3D printers for guided implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:743-6. 10.11607/jomi.607429543930
3
Laverty DP, Buglass J, Patel A. Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery. Br Dent J 2018;224:601-11. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.26829622801
4
Eftekhar AR, Ghasemi Z, Nami M, Mighani F, Namdari M. Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: a systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;122:600-7. 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.10.01033161170
5
Beretta M, Poli PP, Maiorana C. Accuracy of computer-aided template-guided oral implant placement: a prospective clinical study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2014;44:184-93. 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.4.18425177520PMC4148631
6
Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000. 2019;81:194-208. 10.1111/prd.1229231407433
7
Al YF, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dent Clin North Am 2019;63:381-97. 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.00631097133
8
Apostolakis D, Kourakis G. CAD/CAM implant surgical guides: maximum errors in implant positioning attributable to the properties of the metal sleeve/osteotomy drill combination. Int J Implant Dent 2018;4:34. 10.1186/s40729-018-0146-230411253PMC6224327
9
Van AN, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computeraided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:112-23. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x23062136
10
Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Maida T, Cheng HC, Ou KL, Nezu T, et al. Stereolithographic surgical guide with a combination of tooth and bone support: accuracy of guided implant surgery in distal extension situation. J Clin Med 2020;9:709. 10.3390/jcm903070932151043PMC7141331
11
Toyoshima T, Tanaka H, Sasaki M, Ichimaru E, Naito Y, Matsushita Y, et al. Accuracy of implant surgery with surgical guide by inexperienced clinicians: an in vitro study. Clin Exp Dent Res 2015;1:10-7. 10.1002/cre2.329744135PMC5839200
12
Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:630-4. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02436.x22413853
13
Schneider D, Schober F, Grohmann P, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. In-vitro evaluation of the tolerance of surgical instruments in templates for computer-assisted guided implantology produced by 3-D printing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:320-5. 10.1111/clr.1232724438229
14
Yeung M, Abdulmajeed A, Carrico CK, Deeb GR, Bencharit S. Accuracy and precision of 3D-printed implant surgical guides with different implant systems: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:821-8. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.02731653399
15
El Kholy K, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, Faerber K, Buser R, Buser D. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:1067-75. 10.1111/clr.1352031381178
16
Oh KC, Park JM, Shim JS, Kim JH, Kim JE, Kim JH. Assessment of metal sleeve-free 3D-printed implant surgical guides. Dent Mater 2019;35:468-76. 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.00130685109
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of implantology and applied sciences
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 25
  • No :4
  • Pages :147-157
  • Received Date : 2021-08-23
  • Revised Date : 2021-09-29
  • Accepted Date : 2021-10-16
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2021016
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close