Histological Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Lift and Ridge Preservation with Deproteinized Porcine Bone Mineral (DPBM): Case Report

Seungmin Kim; Jae-Suk Jung; Ui-Won Jung; Seong-ho Choi; Jung-Seok Lee

doi:10.32542/implantology.20170003

All Issue

2017 Vol.21, Issue 1 Preview Page Next Page

Histological Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus Lift and Ridge Preservation with Deproteinized Porcine Bone Mineral (DPBM): Case Report 돼지 유래 이종골 이식재를 이용한 상악동거상술과 치조제보존술을 시행한 부위의 조직학적 소견을 동반한 증례 보고

March 2017. pp. 24-32

PDF XML

Abstract

Background: Alveolar bone loss caused after tooth extraction can be overcome by maxillary sinus lift and ridge preservation. Many researchers reported implant surgery was successful at the site of bone graft. But, there are few studies with histologic findings. More research on this must be needed.

Case presentation: A-78-year-old female was visited for extraction and implantation on maxillary molar area. The teeth in position 26 was extracted and the extraction socket was preserved with deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) and pedicle flap. Implant was installed at 4 months after ridge preservation and successfully maintained. Histologically, new bone and collagen fibers were found. A-52-year-old female was referred for maxillary sinus elevation on left side with infected history. One year after removal of infected graft materials, reoperation was performed for maxillary sinus lift. Four months after the operation, implant placement was successful. Histologically, new bone and many vessels were found.

Conclusion: Clinical results were obtained when implants were placed after 4 months of healing period at the site of maxillary sinus lift and ridge preservation. Histologically, new bone formation was confirmed, which is favorable for initial implant fixation and the implant placement time may be shortened. In addition, xenogenous bone graft materials are considered a viable option for bone grafting.

Keywords

Bone graft

Guided bone regeneration

Maxillary sinus elevation

Maxillary sinus lift

Ridge preservation

References

Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, et al. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A Suppl 2 Pt 2: 98-103.

10.2106/00004623-200100022-00007

Yang HM, Bae HE, Won SY, et al. The buccofacial wall of maxillary sinus: an anatomical consideration for sinus augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11 Suppl 1: e2-6.

10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00138.x19438968

Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 433-440.

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01705.x19522974

Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24 Suppl: 260-271.

19885449

Lee JS, Shin HK, Yun JH, et al. Randomized clinical trial of maxillary sinus grafting using deproteinized porcine and bovine bone mineral. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016.

Lambert F, Vincent K, Vanhoutte V, et al. A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: hard tissue profile. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39: 887-894.

10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01900.x22708823

Lutz R, Berger-Fink S, Stockmann P, et al. Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovinederived xenograft - a 5-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 644-648.

10.1111/clr.1235225906198

Kim J, McBride S, Dean DD, et al. In vivo performance of combinations of autograft, demineralized bone matrix, and tricalcium phosphate in a rabbit femoral defect model. Biomed Mater. 2014; 9: 035010.

10.1088/1748-6041/9/3/03501024784998

Gunes N, Dundar S, Saybak A, et al. Systemic and local zoledronic acid treatment with hydroxyapatite bone graft: A histological and histomorphometric experimental study. Exp Ther Med. 2016; 12: 2417-2422.

10.3892/etm.2016.368527698743PMC5038845

Bae SY, Park JC, Shin HS, et al. Tomographic and histometric analysis of autogenous bone block and synthetic hydroxyapatite block grafts without rigid fixation on rabbit calvaria. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014; 44: 251-258.

10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.25125368814PMC4216402

Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25.

3527955

Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, et al. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012; 91: 242-248.

10.1177/002203451143125222157097

Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 688-698.

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x20636724

Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015: Cd010176.

10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub2

Kim JH, Susin C, Min JH, et al. Extraction sockets: erratic healing impeding factors. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41: 80-85.

10.1111/jcpe.1217324117498

Kohal RJ, Straub LM, Wolkewitz M, et al. Evaluation of guided bone regeneration around oral implants over different healing times using two different bovine bone materials: a randomized, controlled clinical and histological investigation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17: 957-971.

10.1111/cid.1220624814892

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :Implantology
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 21
No :1
Pages :24-32
Received Date : 2017-03-02
Revised Date : 2017-03-30
Accepted Date : 2017-03-31
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20170003

Journal of implantology and applied sciences ISSN:2765-7833(Print) 2765-7841(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue