Implant-Fixed Prostheses Restoration with New Retention Type Using Spread Fit Ti-Base System: A Case Report

Tae-Min Park, Chang-Mo Jeong, Soyun Kim, Soohong Kim, Jung-Bo Huh

doi:10.32542/implantology.202018

All Issue

2020 Vol.24, Issue 4 Preview Page Next Page

Clinical or Case Report

Implant-Fixed Prostheses Restoration with New Retention Type Using Spread Fit Ti-Base System: A Case Report

December 2020. pp. 203-211

PDF XML

Abstract

Spread Fit (SFIT) Ti-Base System was developed to overcome complications of conventional implant prosthesis system. This system uses a specific locking mechanism between the abutment and prosthesis instead of cement or screws, providing easy retrievability and no possibility of biological complications. This case report introduces clinical experience with a 3 - month follow-up of implant fixed prosthesis fabricated with SFIT Ti - Base System on a right maxillary posterior edentulous site. No biological complications or loss of retention was observed during the observation time. SFIT TiBase System is expected to be used in various clinical cases in the future.

Keywords

Alveolar ridge split

Dental implant

Guided bone regeneration

References

Misch CE. Screw-retained versus cement-retained implant supported prostheses. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-8.

Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses:which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-41.

Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 1999. p. 642-91, 716-44.

Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35. 10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70203-8

Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Garefis PD. Cement retained versus screw-retained implant restorations:a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:719-28.

Heo YK, Lim YJ. A newly designed screw- and cement-retained prosthesis and its abutments. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:612-4 10.11607/ijp.423626523721

Choi JW, Choi KH, Chae HJ, Chae SK, Bae EB, Lee JJ, et al. Load-bearing capacity and retention of newly developed microlocking implant prosthetic system: An in vitro pilot study. Materials (Basel). 2018;11:564. 10.3390/ma1104056429642407PMC5951448

Shah KC, Seo YR, Wu BM. Clinical application of a shape memory implant abutment system. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:8-12. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.06.00727622784

Denny C, Russell C, Benjamin W, Kumar S. Digital workflow for predictable immediate loading in the mandible by using a shape memory dental implant abutment system: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123:1-5. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.04.01331153616

Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W. Cement associated peri-implantitis: A retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:797-802. 10.1111/clr.1217323600620

Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76. 10.1067/mpr.2001.11468511319534

Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e83-9. 10.1111/clr.1206223088616

Dailey B, Jordan L, Blind O, Tavernier B. Axial displacement of abutments into implants and implant replicas, with the tapered cone-screw internal connection, as a function of tightening torque. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:251-6.

Information

Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
Journal Title :IMPLANTOLOGY
Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
Volume : 24
No :4
Pages :203-211
Received Date :2020. 10. 06
Revised Date :2020. 11. 09
Accepted Date : 2020. 12. 03
DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.202018

IMPLANTOLOGY ISSN:1229-5418(Print) 2671-6623(Online) 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지

All Issue