All Issue

2018 Vol.22, Issue 4

Original Article

Long-term Retrospective Study on Cumulative Survival Rate of Implants with Guided Bone Regeneration

골유도재생술을 동반한 임플란트의 생존율에 대한 연구

Suk-Hyun Jung1**
,
Jun-Hwan Kim2**
,
Da-Jeong Namgung2
,
Yun-Jeong Kim23
,
Jaeeun Chung23
,
Young Ku2*
정 석현1**
,
김 준환2**
,
남궁 다정2
,
김 윤정23
,
정 재은23
,
구 영2*
1Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
2Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, BK21 program, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
3Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital, Seoul 08826, Korea
1서울대학교 치의학대학원 치의학과
2서울대학교 치의학대학원 치주과학교실
3관악서울대학교치과병원 치주과
*Corresponding Author
**These authors contributed equally to this work.
30 December 2018. pp. 196-209
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the cumulative survival rate of dental implants installed with guided bone regeneration (GBR), and also elucidate the factors related with the survival of dental implants.

Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 148 dental implants installed in 76 patients by one specialist (Y.K.) at the Department of Periodontology and Implant Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital from 2001 to 2010. The cumulative survival rates were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method. The correlations between various factors and dental implant survival were analyzed by using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: Among 148 dental implants installed in 76 patients, 8 implants in 7 patients were lost and the cumulative survival rates up to 5-years and 10-years were 97% and 89%, respectively. Gender, smoking status and location of implant were significantly associated with the cumulative survival rate of implants (p < 0.05). Age, history of hypertension and diabetes were not significantly associated with the cumulative survival rate of implants (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The dental implants installed with guided bone regeneration is predictable technique according to the results of cumulative survival rate over 10 years.

Keywords
Cumulative survival rate
Dental implant
Guided bone regeneration
References
1
Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I: Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969; 3: 81-100.
10.3109/028443169090366994924041
2
Branemark PI, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Reconstruction of the defective mandible. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 9: 116-128.
10.3109/028443175090227761103278
3
Block MS, Degen Y. Horizontal ridge augmentation using human mineralized particulate bone: Preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62: 67-72.
10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.209
4
Nyman S, Lang NP, Buser D, et al. Bone regeneration adjacent to titanium dental implants using guided tissue regeneration: a report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 9-14.
2391139
5
Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes. Periodontol 2000. 2003; 33: 36-53.
10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03304.x
6
Hammerle CHF, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29(Suppl 3): 226-231.
10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.14.x12787222
7
Buser D, Weber HP, Bragger U, et al. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991; 6: 405-412.
1820309
8
Buser D, Dula K, Belser U, et al. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. I. Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992; 13: 29-45.
9
Buser D, Dula K, Belser UC, et al. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration. II. Surgical procedure in the mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995; 15: 10-29.
7591520
10
Buser D, Dula K, Hirt HP, et al. Lateral ridge augmentation using autografts and barrier membranes: A clinical study with 40 partially edentulous patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 420-432.
10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90113-5
11
Buser D, Dula K, Lang NP, et al. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique. 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996; 7: 175-183.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070212.x9002837
12
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 113-123.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01781.x19663958
13
Jovanovic SA, Schenk RK, Orsini M, et al. Supracrestal bone formation around dental implants: an experimental dog study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994; 10: 23-31.
14
Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 402-415.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01486.x18324961
15
Becker W, Becker B. Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences: surgical techniques and case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1989; 10: 376-391.
16
Simion M, Scarano A, Gionso L, et al. Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: a comparative histologic study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11: 735-742.
8990634
17
Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Buser D, et al. Evaluation of guided bone generation around implants placed into fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51: 879-884.
10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80108-9
18
Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990; 1: 33-40.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x2099210
19
Cochran DL, Buser D, Ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI (R) implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI (R) SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13: 144-153.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x11952734
20
Blanco J, Alonso A, Sanz M. Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year case series prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 294-301.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01106.x15877749
21
Zitzmann NU, Schärer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16: 355-366.
11432655
22
Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, et al. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002; 22: 109-117.
12019706
23
Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 502-510.
19587874
24
El Helow K, El Askary Ael S. Regenerative barriers in immediate implant placement: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 360-371.
10.1097/ID.0b013e318181340618784536
25
Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: Clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23: 599-605.
14703764
26
Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Haas R, et al. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014; 44: 102-108.
10.5051/jpis.2014.44.3.10224921053PMC4050226
27
Schwartz-Arad D, Laviv A, Levin L. Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2008; 17: 200-207.
10.1097/ID.0b013e318177790618545052
28
Moraschini V, Barboza ED. Success of dental implants in smokers and non-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 205-215.
10.1016/j.ijom.2015.08.99626385308
29
Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, et al. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20: 569-577.
16161741
30
Javed F, Romanos, GE. Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review. J Periodontol. 2009; 80: 1719-1730.
10.1902/jop.2009.09028319905942
31
Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Branemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 671-677.
12381067
32
Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, et al. Insertion torque of immediate wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis. Quintessence Int. 2012; 43: e115-126.
23041998
33
Hertel RC, Kalk W. Influence of the dimensions of implant superstructure on peri-implant bone loss. Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6: 18-24.
8507325
34
Renouard F, Nisand, D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 35-51.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x16968380
35
Lemos CAA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, et al. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016; 47: 8-17.
10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.00526804969
36
French D, Larjava H, Ofec R. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2015; 26: 1345-1354.
10.1111/clr.1246325134415
37
Vandeweghe S, Ferreira D, Vermeersch L, et al. Long-term retrospective follow-up of turned and moderately rough implants in the edentulous jaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 421-426.
10.1111/clr.1260225856319
38
Kim SJ, Kim JH, Namgung DJ, et al. A Long-term cumulative survival rate of immediate implants: Retrospective study. Periodontology. 2018; 22: 36-48.
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 22
  • No :4
  • Pages :196-209
  • Received Date : 2018-11-05
  • Revised Date : 2018-12-03
  • Accepted Date : 2018-12-10
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180016
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close