All Issue

2020 Vol.24, Issue 1

Original Article

Influence of Rotary Instrument Mineral Oil Lubricant on the Handpiece for Dental Implant: In Vitro and In Vivo Study

치과용 임플란트 식립에 사용되는 핸드피스의 윤활제가 생체내 미치는 영향

Heon-Young Kim1
,
Min-Kyoung Kim2
,
Il-Seok Jang3
,
Ju-Dong Song4
,
Sun-Jong Kim5
,
Jin-Woo Kim6*
김 헌영1
,
김 민경2
,
장 일석3
,
송 주동4
,
김 선종5
,
김 진우6*
1Fellow, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center
2Research Scientist, Bio R&D Center, Osstem implant Co., Ltd.
3Senior Researcher, Bio R&D Center, Osstem implant Co., Ltd.
4Director, Bio R&D Center, Osstem implant Co., Ltd.
5Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center
6Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center
1이화여자대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과 전임의
2오스템 임플란트 Bio R&D center 선임연구원
3오스템 임플란트 Bio R&D center 책임연구원
4오스템 임플란트 Bio R&D center 이사/연구소장
5이화여자대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과 교수
6이화여자대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과 조교수
*Corresponding Author
31 March 2020. pp. 1-12
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of oil lubricant for dental handpiece and to investigate the relationship to the prognosis of dental implants.

Materials and Methods: An experiment was conducted on the residual amount of lubricant in the handpiece and the amount of lubricant that will remain in the fixture after drilling. Based on the data, biocompatibility was assessed through the assessment of cytotoxicity with L929 cells and 33 SD rats. This experiment was conducted through an 8 mm-long, 3.5 mm-diameter fixture(Osstem implant Co., Ltd., Korea) and lubricant(KaVo Dental GmbH., Germany) for handpiece.

Results: The amount of lubricants in the handpiece decreased with the removal phase, but some of them could be confirmed to remain. In the cytotoxicity assessment, the survival rate was lower over 100 ppm. In experiments with SD rat, there was no significant difference among groups.

Conclusion: The surface of the dental implants could be contaminated from some leftover lubricants in the handpiece. Although the lubricant is the biocompatible in cytotoxicity test and SD rat test, it does not mean it has no effect on osseointegration.

Keywords
Dental implant
Lubricant
Surface contamination
Cytotoxicity
Biocompatibility
References
1
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in thetreatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10(6):387-416.
10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
2
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11-25.
3
Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland W, Rupp F, Geis‐Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, et al. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;74(1):49-58.
10.1002/jbm.a.3032015924300
4
Liu X, Lim JY, Donahue HJ, Dhurjati R, Mastro AM, Vogler EA. Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro. Biomaterials 2007;28(31):4535-50.
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.01617644175PMC2705827
5
Zareidoost A, Yousefpour M, Ghaseme B, Amanzadeh A. The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23(6):1479-88.
10.1007/s10856-012-4611-922460230PMC3368253
6
Carmagnola D, Araujo M, Berglundh T, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J. Bone tissue reaction around implants placed in a compromised jaw. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26(10):629-35.
10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.261001.x10522773
7
Al‐Sayyed A, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Watson PA, Pharoah M, Berhane K, et al. Predictable crestal bone remodelling around two porous‐coated titanium alloy dental implant designs. A radiographic study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5(3):131-41.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050303.x7827227
8
Lundgren A, Lundgren D, Wennerberg A, Hämmerle CH, Nyman S. Influence of surface roughness of barrier walls on guided bone augmentation: experimental study in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1(1):41-8.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00090.x11359310
9
Att W, Tsukimura N, Suzuki T, Ogawa T. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1-and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(5):719-28.
10
Holtorf HL, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. Ectopic bone formation in rat marrow stromal cell/titanium fiber mesh scaffold constructs: effect of initial cell phenotype. Biomaterials 2005;26(31):6208-16.
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.00615921737
11
Khang D, Lu J, Yao C, Haberstroh MK, Webster JT. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008;29(8):970-83.
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.00918096222
12
Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(2):200-10.
13
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(1):63-74.
14
Kronström M, Svenson B, Hellman M, Persson GR. Early implant failures in patients treated with Brånemark System titanium dental implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16(2):201-7.
15
Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. The journal of prosthetic dentistry 1998;80(6):639-40.
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70047-2
16
Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:197-212.
10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.12.x12787220
17
Palma-Carrió C, Maestre-Ferrín L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Risk factors associated with early failure of dental implants. A literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16(4):e514-7.
10.4317/medoral.16.e51421196891
18
Baqain ZH, Moqbel WY, Sawair FA. Early dental implant failure: risk factors. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50(3):239-43.
10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.07421612850
19
Sverzut AT, Stabile GAV, de Moraes M, Mazzonetto R, Moreira RW. The influence of tobacco on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66(5):1004-9.
10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.03218423293
20
Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(2):142-6.
10.1097/00008505-199200110-00017
21
Olate S, Lyrio MCN, de Moraes M, Mazzonetto R, Fernandes Moreira RW. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(2):414-9.
10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.00220116716
22
Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Michiles K, Teughels W, Komárek A, van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of failures up to abutment connection with modified surface oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(1):51-7.
23
Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Komárek A, van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34(7):610-7.
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01077.x17433044
24
Leite MF, Santos MC, de Souza AP, Line SR. Osseointegrated implant failure associated with MMP-1 promotor polymorphisms (-1607 and-519). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(4):653-8
25
Noguerol B, Muñoz R, Mesa F, Dios Luna JD, O'Valle F. Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest ® : retrospective study of a large sample. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17(4):459-64.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01250.x16907779
26
Van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Desnyder M, Maffei G, Quirynen M. The relative impact of local and endogenous patient‐related factors on implant failure up to the abutment stage. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(6):617-22.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130607.x12519336
27
Buser D, Schenk R, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25(7):889-902.
10.1002/jbm.8202507081918105
28
Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(4):381-92.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x15248872
29
Albertini M, Fernandez-Yague M, Lázaro P, Herrero-Climent M, Rios-Santos J-V, Bullon P, et al. Advances in surfaces and osseointegration in implantology. Biomimetic surfaces. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015;20(3):e316-e25.
10.4317/medoral.2035325662555PMC4464919
30
Yuan K, Chan Y-J, Kung K-C, Lee TM. Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(1): 32-40.
10.11607/jomi.243624451851
31
Morra M, Cassinelli C, Bollati D, Cascardo G, Bellanda M. Adherent endotoxin on dental implant surfaces: a reappraisal. J Oral Implantol 2015;41(1):10-6.
10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-0013725699642
32
Bi Y, Seabold JM, Kaar SG, Ragab AA, Goldberg VM, Anderson JM et al. Adherent endotoxin on orthopedic wear particles stimulates cytokine production and osteoclast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 2001;16(11):2082-91.
10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.11.208211697805
33
Greenfield EM, Bi Y, Ragab AA, Goldberg VM, Nalepka JL, Seabold JM. Does endotoxin contribute to aseptic loosening of orthopedic implants?. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;72(1):179-85.
10.1002/jbm.b.3015015449253
34
Bonsignore LA, Colbrunn RW, Tatro JM, Messerschmitt PJ, Hernandez CJ, Goldberg VM, et al. Surface contaminants inhibit osseointegration in a novel murine model. Bone 2011;49(5):923-30.
10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.01321801863PMC3200470
35
Bonsignore LA, Goldberg VM, Greenfield EM. Machine oil inhibits the osseointegration of orthopaedic implants by impairing osteoblast attachment and spreading. J Orthop Res 2015;33(7):979-87.
10.1002/jor.2285025676177
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 24
  • No :1
  • Pages :1-12
  • Received Date : 2020-02-25
  • Revised Date : 2020-03-29
  • Accepted Date : 2020-03-30
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.202001
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close