All Issue

2018 Vol.22, Issue 2
June 2018. pp. 72-79

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing process after autogenous and allogenous bone grafts for calvarial bone defects in beagles.

Materials and Methods: Two defects were formed in the skulls of two beagles and then grafted with a freeze-dried bone allograft (Double-Oss) and an autogenous bone chip, respectively. The clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometric examination results of the specimens taken 4 and 8 weeks after bone grafting were analyzed.

Results: The clinical, radiographic, and histological assessments revealed that 4 and 8 weeks after transplant, the beagle that received an autogenous bone graft was more likely to have high new bone formation than the beagle that had an allogenous bone. Four weeks after the transplant, the proportions of new bone formation were 11.5% and 35.8% in the allogenous and autogenous bones, respectively. Eight weeks after the transplant, the proportion of new bone formation with the allogenous bone increased significantly to 41.4% but was still less than the 65.6% with the autogenous bone.

Conclusion: The amount of new bone formation was smaller and the formation rate was slower with allogenous bone graft than with autogenous bone graft.

  1. Kim YK, Lee JH, PY Yun, et al. Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014; 44: 216-221.10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.21625368809PMC4216397
  2. Samuel P. Xavier, Rafael R. Dias, Felipe P. Sehn, et al. Maxillary sinus grafting with autograft vs. fresh frozen allograft: a split-mouth histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 1080-1085.10.1111/clr.1240424734909
  3. Eduardo Borie, Ramon Fuentes, Mariano del Sol, et al. The influence of FDBA and autogenous bone particles on regeneration of calvaria defect in the rabbit: A pilot study. Ann Anatomy. 2011; 193: 412-417.10.1016/j.aanat.2011.06.00321802915
  4. Ronald E. Jung, Vitor M. Sapata, Christoph H. F. Hammerle, et al. Combines use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 3: 1-8.
  5. Gonzalo H Oporto V, Ramon Fuentes, Eduardo Borie. Radiographical and clinical evaluation of critical size defects in rabbit calvaria filled with allograft and autograft: a pilot study. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014: 7(7); 1669-1675.
  6. Kim YK, Yun PiY, Lee HJ, et al. Ridge Preservation of the Molar Extraction Socket Using Collagen Sponge and Xenogeneic Bone Grafts. Implant Dent. 2011; 20(4): 267-272.10.1097/ID.0b013e3182166afc21753734
  7. Araújo, Mauricio, Linder, Elena et al. The Influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on Healing of an Extraction Socket: An Experimental Study in the Dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28(2): 123-135.
  8. Bozidar M. B. Brkovic, Hari S. Prasad, Michael D. Rohrer, et al. Beta-tricalcium phosphate/type I collagen cones with or without a barrier membrane in human extraction socket healing: clinical, histologic, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical evaluation. Clin Oral Invest. 2012; 16(2): 581-590.10.1007/s00784-011-0531-121369794
  9. Cardaropoli, Daniele, Roffredo, Alessandro, et al. Socket Preservation Using Bovine Bone Mineral and Collagen Membrane: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with Histologic Analysis. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2012; 32(4): 420-430.
  10. Stephen S. Wallace, Dennis P. Tarnow, Stuart J. Froum et al. Maxiilary sinus elevation by lateral window approach: Evolution of technology and technique. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2012; S1: 161-171.10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70030-1
  11. Kim YK. Bone graft using two types of scaffolds and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: Case series study. ORAL BIOLOGY RESEARCH. 2014; 38(2): 127-134.10.21851/obr.38.2.201410.127
  12. Cheng H, Jiang W, Phillips FM. Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85: 1544-1552.10.2106/00004623-200308000-0001712925636
  13. Bragdon B, Moseychuk O, Saldanha S et al. Bone morphogenetic proteins: a critical review. Cell Signal. 2011; 23: 609-620.10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.10.00320959140
  14. Gregory M. Cooper, Mark P. Mooney, Arun K. Gosain et al. Testing the critical size in calvarial bone defect revisiting the concept of a critical-sized defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125(6): 1685-1692.10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb63a320517092PMC2946111
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :IMPLANTOLOGY
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 22
  • No :2
  • Pages :72-79
  • Received Date :2018. 06. 04
  • Accepted Date : 2018. 06. 29