All Issue

2019 Vol.23, Issue 2

Original Article

Interdisciplinary Approaches for Resolution of Non-Ideal Interocclusal Space Prior to Dental Implant Treatments

임플란트 치료 전 이상적인 교합 고경으로의 회복을 위한 다학제적 접근에 대한 연구

Young Woo Song1**
,
Doo Heung Kim1**
,
Joo-Hyun Kang1
,
Jae-Kook Cha1
,
Ui-Won Jung1*
송 영우1**
,
김 두흥1**
,
강 주현1
,
차 재국1
,
정 의원1*
1Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry
1연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소
*Corresponding Author
**These authors contributed equally to this work.
30 June 2019. pp. 72-85
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this review is to investigate various kinds of treatments which could be performed to recover non-ideal interocclusal space to ideal state prior to implant placements.

Material and Methods: According to the definition of ideal interocclusal space reported previously, orthodontic, surgical and prosthodontic treatments to resolve an excessive or insufficient interocclusal space were reviewed. Among 899 articles searched by “Pubmed”, 34 articles were screened by inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Results: In cases of having an insufficient interocclusal space, orthodontic intrusion which could be the least invasive treatment, segmental osteotomy which is the most invasive, and prosthodontic restoration can be possible options for the treatment. When an excessive interocclusal space is observed, some surgical techniques can be performed, including onlay block bone graf t and distraction osteotomy. In some cases, two or more treatments may be needed to have an ideal interocclusal space for implantation.

Conclusion: The interdisciplinary approach may be needed for having a predictable result after dental implantation to recover a non-ideal interocclusal space to an appropriate state.

Keywords
Dental implant
Interocclusal space
Orthodontic treatment
Surgical treatment
Prosthodontic treatment
References
1
Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1. Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 312-318.
10.1097/01.id.0000188375.76066.2316361879
2
Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent. 2006; 15: 113-121.
10.1097/01.id.0000217907.18396.1816766892
3
McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, et al. Classification system for partial edentulism. J Prosthodont. 2002; 11: 181-193.
10.1053/jopr.2002.12609412237799
4
Craddock HL, Youngson CC, Manogue M, et al. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 1: a study of clinical parameters associated with the extent and type of supraeruption in unopposed posterior teeth. J Prosthodont. 2007; 16: 485-494.
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00212.x17559530
5
Bulaqi HA, Mousavi Mashhadi M, Safari H, et al. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113: 548-557.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.00725794917
6
Craddock HL. Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 3. A study of clinical parameters associated with the presence of occlusal interferences following posterior tooth loss. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17: 25-30.
17927736
7
Baek MS, Choi YJ, Yu HS, et al. Long-term stability of anterior open-bite treatment by intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 396.e1-9; discussion 396-398.
10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.02320889043
8
Peterson LJ. Posterior mandibular segmental alveolar osteotomy. J Oral Surg. 1978; 36: 454-458.
9
Gultekin BA, Cansiz E, Borahan MO. Clinical and 3-Dimensional radiographic evaluation of autogenous iliac block bone grafting and guided bone regeneration in patients with atrophic maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016.
10.1016/j.joms.2016.11.01927998736
10
Kim S, Choe SH, Song YW, et al. Consideration of minimal interocclusal distance for Implantsupported prosthesis. 2017; 21: 54-64.
10.12972/implantology.20170005
11
Sekine H, Miyazaki H, Takanashi T, et al. Dental implant treatment after improvement of oral environment by orthodontic therapy. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2012; 53: 109-117.
10.2209/tdcpublication.53.10923124300
12
Miller TE. Orthodontic therapy for the restorative patient. Part I: The biomechanic aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61: 268-276.
10.1016/0022-3913(89)90126-1
13
Park YC, Lee K. Biomechanical principles in miniscrew-driven orthodontic., in Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics. 2009; 93-144.
14
Xun CL, Zhao H, Zeng XL, et al. Intrusion of overerupted maxillary molars with miniscrew implant anchorage: a radiographic evaluation. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2013; 33: 780-785.
10.1007/s11596-013-1197-524142737
15
Yao CC, Lee JJ, Chen HY, et al. Maxillary molar intrusion with fixed appliances and mini-implant anchorage studied in three dimensions. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 754-760.
16
Slighly C, Ramos V Jr., Brousseau S. Orthodontic single tooth intrusion with a removable interocclusal device: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 283-286.
10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60301-7
17
Liu Q, Huang XQ, Jiang D, et al. Orthodontic intrusion of the first and second mandibular molars with a vacuum-formed removable appliance: a case report. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018; 36: 226-228.
18
Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Spada MC, et al. Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 73-81.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00998.x14731180
19
Schmitt C, Karasholi T, Lutz R, et al. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and combination of both techniques: a long-term retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: e38-46.
10.1111/clr.1204523075057
20
Boven GC, Meijer HJ, Vissink A, et al. Reconstruction of the extremely atrophied mandible with iliac crest onlay grafts followed by two endosteal implants: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43: 626-632.
10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.00324411276
21
Felice P, Pistilli R, Lizio G, et al. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11 Suppl 1: e69-82.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00212.x19681938
22
Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Dias Pereira LA, et al. Fate of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts used for ridge augmentation. A CBCT-based analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 167-173.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02324.x22093001
23
Peck MT. Alveolar ridge augmentation using the allograft bone shell technique. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015; 16: 768-773.
10.5005/jp-journals-10024-175526522605
24
Waasdorp J, Reynolds MA. Allogeneic bone onlay grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25: 525-531.
25
Jegham H, Masmoudi R, Ouertani H, et al. Ridge augmentation with titanium mesh: A case report. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 118: 181-186.
10.1016/j.jormas.2017.03.00128363847
26
Park YH, Choi SH, Cho KS, et al. Dimensional alterations following vertical ridge augmentation using collagen membrane and three types of bone grafting materials: A retrospective observational study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19: 742-749.
10.1111/cid.1250228556452
27
Yun KI, Choi H, Wright RF, et al. Efficacy of alveolar vertical distraction osteogenesis and autogenous bone grafting for dental implants: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31: 26-36.
10.11607/jomi.447926800160
28
Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P, et al. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 82-95.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00999.x14731181
29
Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 432-440.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01351.x17501979
30
Kim JW, Cho MH, Kim SJ, et al. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone graft for vertical augmentation of severely atrophied alveolar ridges after 12 years of long-term follow-up. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 116: 540-549.
10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.03724021775
31
Meningaud JP, Pitak-Arnnop P, Corcos L, et al. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for mandibular implants placement: case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 102: e1-3.
10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.01317052616
32
Basa S, Varol A, Sener ID, et al. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for restoring the mandible with dental implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 99: 340-343.
10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60080-3
33
Hwang JH, Jung BY, Lim CS, et al. Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy concomitant with sinus lift using a piezoelectric device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 2339-2344.
10.1016/j.joms.2011.04.02321802189
34
Laviv A, Jensen OT, Tarazi E, et al. Alveolar sandwich osteotomy in resorbed alveolar ridge for dental implants: a 4-year prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72: 292-303.
10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.03624321312
35
Mansour HH, Badr A, Osman AH, et al. Anterior maxillary sandwich osteotomy technique with simultaneous implant placement: A novel approach for management of vertical deficiency. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21: 160-168.
10.1111/cid.1268730411842
36
Jackson CR, Skidmore AE, Rice RT, Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 323-325.
10.1016/0022-3913(92)90238-6
37
Goldberg PV, Higginbottom FL, Wilson TG, Periodontal considerations in restorative and implant therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2001; 25: 100-109.
10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.22250108.x11155185
38
Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, et al. "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76: 191-197.
39
Ericsson I, Thilander B, Lindhe J, et al. The effect of orthodontic tilting movements on the periodontal tissues of infected and non-infected dentitions in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1977; 4: 278-293.
10.1111/j.1600-051X.1977.tb01900.x271655
40
Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, et al. Evaluation of peri-implant bone resorption around Straumann Bone Level implants placed in areas reconstructed with autogenous vertical onlay bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23: 1012-1021.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02262.x22092480
41
Clementini M, Morlupi A, Agrestini C, et al. Immediate versus delayed positioning of dental implants in guided bone regeneration or onlay graft regenerated areas: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42: 643-650.
10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.01823481543
42
Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Schlee M, et al. Vertical ridge augmentation using the modified shell technique--a case series. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 52: 945-950.
10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.08.00925266138
43
Gotfredsen K, Nimb L, Buser D, et al. Evaluation of guided bone generation around implants placed into fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 51: 879-884; discussion 885-6.
10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80108-9
44
Schneider D, Weber FE, Grunder U, et al. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 150-158.
10.1111/clr.1213223432666
45
Beretta M, Poli PP, Tansella S, et al. Virtually guided alveolar ridge reduction combined with computer-aided implant placement for a bimaxillary implant-supported rehabilitation: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 168-172.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.01029429840
46
Patil K, Khalighinejad N, El-Refai N, et al. The Effect of Crown Lengthening on the Outcome of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth: 10-year Survival Analysis. J Endod. 2019; 45: 696-700.
10.1016/j.joen.2019.02.00631005334
47
Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Suarez-Lopez del Amo F, Monje A, et al. Influence of crown/implant ratio on marginal bone loss: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2014; 85: 1214-1221.
10.1902/jop.2014.13061524444399
48
Bayraktar M, Gultekin BA, Yalcin S, et al. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implant dimensions on periimplant stress of splinted implant-supported crowns: a finite element analysis. Implant Dent. 2013; 22: 406-413.
10.1097/ID.0b013e31829c224d23823738
49
Nissan J, Gross O, Ghelfan O, et al. The effect of splinting implant-supported restorations on stress distribution of different crown-implant ratios and crown height spaces. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 2990-2994.
10.1016/j.joms.2011.06.21021864968
50
Hof M, Pommer B, Zukic N, et al. Influence of prosthetic parameters on peri-implant bone resorption in the first year of loading: a multi-factorial analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17 Suppl 1: e183-91.
10.1111/cid.1215324020722
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 23
  • No :2
  • Pages :72-85
  • Received Date : 2019-06-21
  • Revised Date : 2019-06-26
  • Accepted Date : 2019-06-26
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019006
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close