All Issue

2019 Vol.23, Issue 2 Preview Page

Review Article

Considerations for Fabrication of CAD-CAM Abutments: Part II. Designing Abutment

CAD-CAM 맞춤 지대주 제작 시 고려사항 II. CAD-CAM 지대주 설계과정을 중심으로

Kyung-Ho Ko1
,
Jong-Hyun Park2
,
Lee-Ra Cho3*
고 경호1
,
박 종현2
,
조 리라3*
1Assistant professor, DDS, Ph.D., Gangneung-Wonju National University
2Private practice, DDS, MSD., Duri Dental Clinic
3Professor, DDS, Ph.D., Gangneung-Wonju National University
1강릉원주대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소
2서산 두리치과
3강릉원주대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소
*Corresponding Author
30 June 2019. pp. 112-125
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

CAD-CAM (computer aided design–computer aided manufacturing) abutment is a convenient and useful prosthetic method in tilted implant installation or complicated esthetic situations. However, the dentist must design properly and order wisely so that favorable clinical results can be obtained. Herein, we investigate various factors such as connection type, prosthesis type, margin, emergence profile and gingival contact shape that must be considered in the designing CAD-CAM abutments.

Keywords
CAD-CAM abutment
Emergence profile
Gingival contact shape
Margin
References
1
Ricciardi Coppede A, de Mattos Mda G, Rodrigues RC, et al. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 624-632.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01690.x19281502
2
Lee JH, Huh YH, Park CJ, et al. Effect of the coronal wall thickness of dental implants on the screw joint stability in the internal implant-abutment connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31: 1058-1065.
10.11607/jomi.460027632260
3
Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, et al. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 834-839.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02063.x21198900
4
Saidin S, Abdul Kadir MR, Sulaiman E, et al. Effects of different implant-abutment connections on micromotion and stress distribution: prediction of microgap formation. J Dent. 2012; 40: 467-474.
10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.00922366313
5
Faegh S, Müftü S. Load transfer along the bone-dental implant interface. J Biomech. 2010; 43: 1761-1770.
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.01720202639
6
Cho SY, Huh YH, Park CJ, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis on stress distribution of internal implant-abutment engagement features. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33: 319-327.
10.11607/jomi.578929534119
7
Lee JH, Huh YH, Park CJ, et al. Effect of the coronal wall thickness of dental implants on the screw joint stability in the internal implant-abutment connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016t; 31: 1058-1065.
10.11607/jomi.460027632260
8
Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, et al. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained implantsupported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 11; 26: 1102-1107.
9
Gallucci GO, Grütter L, Nedir R, et al. Esthetic outcomes with porcelain-fused-to-ceramic and allceramic single-implant crowns: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22: 62-69.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01997.x21158931
10
Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, et al. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 802-808.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01717.x19486077
11
Ortorp A, Jemt T. Laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the partially edentulous mandible: a 10-year comparative follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10: 128-139.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x18218053
12
Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17: 536-542.
13
Lee DH, Suh KW, Ryu JJ. Comparison of retentive forces of temporary cements and abutment height used with implant-supported prosthesis. J Korean Acad Prosthodontics. 2008; 43: 280-288.
14
Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, et al. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1106-1115.
15
Bresciano M, Schierano G, Manzella C, et al. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16: 594-598.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01159.x16164467
16
Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Vindasiute E, et al. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 1179-1184.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02570.x22882700
17
Gapski R, Neugeboren N, Pomeranz AZ, et al. Endosseous implant failure influenced by crown cementation: a clinical case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23: 943-946.
18
Korsch M, Obst U, Walther W. Cement-associated peri-implantitis: a retrospective clinical observational study of fixed implant-supported restorations using a methacrylate cement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25: 797-802.
10.1111/clr.1217323600620
19
Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, et al. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 43-47.
10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70086-6
20
Lindhe J, Berglundh T. The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol 2000. 1998; 17: 47-54.
10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00122.x10337312
21
Parpaiola A, Cecchinato D, Toia M, et al. Dimensions of the healthy gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 657-662.
10.1111/clr.1235924611985
22
Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11: 1-11.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001001.x11168188
23
Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 559-571.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120603.x11737099
24
Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent. 2007; 16: 165-175.
10.1097/ID.0b013e318065aa8117563507
25
Pontes AE, Ribeiro FS, Iezzi G, et al. Biologic width changes around loaded implants inserted in different levels in relation to crestal bone: histometric evaluation in canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 483-490.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01506.x18371095
26
Nanci A. Ten Cate's oral histology. 8th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2012.
27
Canullo L, Cocchetto R, Marinotti F, et al. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27: 1492-1499.
10.1111/clr.1258925846254
28
Galván G, Kois JC, Chaiyabutr Y, et al. Cemented implant restoration: a technique for minimizing adverse biologic consequences. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 482-485.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.01726119018
29
Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A. Technique for controlling the cement for an implant crown. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102: 57-58.
10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60102-5
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 23
  • No :2
  • Pages :112-125
  • Received Date : 2019-01-04
  • Revised Date : 2019-03-08
  • Accepted Date : 2019-03-20
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019010
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close