All Issue

2019 Vol.23, Issue 2 Preview Page

Clinical or Case Report

Fabricating an Implant-Supported Crown with Impression Scanning Technology
Ju-Hyoung Lee1*
1Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine
*Corresponding Author
30 June 2019. pp. 86-94
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology automates the fabrication process of implant-supported prostheses. For the CAD/CAM fabrication of implant-supported crowns, virtual models must be generated by capturing of the intraoral situation with intraoral scanners or by digitizing stone casts with laboratory scanners. This article describes a novel method for creating virtual models with impression scanning technology. By using this workflow, an implant-supported crown is rapidly fabricated without intraoral scanning and cast scanning which needs additional time for fabricating stone casts.

Keywords
CAD/CAM
Digital workflow
Implant prosthesis
Impression scanning
Scan body
References
1
Kapos T, Ashy LM, Gallucci GO, et al. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24(suppl): 110-117.
2
Kapos T, Evans C. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(suppl): 117-136.
10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.324660194
3
Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016; 60: 72-84.
10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.00326935333
4
Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, et al. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach. J Prosthodont. 2017; 26: 34-41.
10.1111/jopr.1236226466158
5
Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, et al. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73: 178-192.
10.1111/prd.1216428000274
6
Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, et al. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for singleunit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 403-406.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.00326047800
7
Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann WH, et al. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18: 101-129.
8
Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, et al. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116: 184-190.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.01726946916
9
Henry PJ, Harnist DJ. Dimensional stability and accuracy of rubber impression materials. Aust Dent J. 1974; 19: 162-166.
10.1111/j.1834-7819.1974.tb05033.x
10
Lacy AM, Fukui H, Bellman T, et al. Time-dependent accuracy of elastomer impression materials. Part II: Polyether, polysulfides, and polyvinylsiloxane. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45: 329-333.
10.1016/0022-3913(81)90400-5
11
Joda T, Brägger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 1430-1435.
10.1111/clr.1247625179680
12
Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 549-553.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.01926182854
13
Jeon JH, Jung ID, Kim JH, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34: 686-691.
10.4012/dmj.2014-34726438993
14
Jeon JH, Kim DY, Lee JJ, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016; 8: 214-218.
10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.21427350856PMC4919492
15
Matta RE, Adler W, Wichmann M, et al. Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117: 507-512.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.02627881327
16
Mandelli F, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, et al. Improvement of a digital impression with conventional materials: overcoming intraoral scanner limitations. Int J Prosthodont. 2017; 30: 373-376.
10.11607/ijp.513828697209
17
Lee B, Oh KC, Haam D, et al. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital impression procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120: 225-231.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.00329428522
18
Wilson EG, Werrin SR. Double arch impressions for simplified restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49: 198-202.
10.1016/0022-3913(83)90500-0
19
Donovan TE, Chee WW. A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. Dent Clin North Am. 2004; 48: 445-470.
10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.01415172610
20
Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, et al. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103: 13-22.
10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60208-0
21
Lee JH. A completely cast-free, digital workflow for fabricating an implant-supported prosthesis with a new coded healing abutment. Implantol. 2019; 23: 32-41.
10.32542/implantology.2019003
22
Parpaiola A, Norton MR, Cecchinato D, et al. Virtual abutment design: A concept for delivery of CAD/CAM customized abutments - report of a retrospective cohort. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 51-58.
10.11607/prd.127223342347
23
Goldstein G, Vafiadis D, Kim J. Finding Z: A mathematical method for predicting tissue position after implant abutment-restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 322-324.
10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.02724793352
24
Mehl A. A new concept for the integration of dynamic occlusion in the digital construction process. Int J Comput Dent. 2012; 15: 109-123.
25
Moráguez OD, Belser UC. The use of polytetrafluoroethylene tape for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2010; 103: 189-191.
10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60029-7
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 23
  • No :2
  • Pages :86-94
  • Received Date : 2018-11-02
  • Revised Date : 2019-06-05
  • Accepted Date : 2019-06-12
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019007
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close