All Issue

2019 Vol.23, Issue 3

Original Article

Retrospective Observational Study of Narrow Diameter Implants

좁은 직경 임플란트의 후향적 관찰 연구

Jung-Gon Lee1
,
Dong-Woo Kang1
,
Pil-Young Yun1
,
Young-Kyun Kim12*
이 중곤1
,
강 동우1
,
윤 필영1
,
김 영균12*
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173, 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea
2Department of Dentistry & Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Daehak-ro 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea
1분당서울대학교병원 치과 구강악안면외과
2서울대학교 치의학대학원 치의학과
*Corresponding Author
30 September 2019. pp. 138-148
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Purpose: To Analyse clinical treatment outcomes and prognosis of patients who have received narrow diameter implants due to anterior tooth loss, and to assess long-term success measured through radiological examination.Material and Methods: From December 2006 to June 2017, Thirty-six patients were selected, and fifty-two narrow diameter implants were inserted by 1 surgeon. All prosthetic appliance were fabricated by the two prosthodontist. The dental records of each patient were reviewed. Measuring of marginal bone loss and accessing implant success rate were performed.Results: Thirty-nine NR lines (Dentium, Suwon, Korea) and thirteen Slim lines (Dentium, Suwon, and Korea) were inserted. The implant used was 2mm to 4.3mm in diameter and 9mm to 12mm in length. NR line implant success rate was 87.2%, survival rate was 92.1%, and Slimline line implant success rate was 92.3%, and survival rate was 92.3%. The average marginal bone loss was 0.22±0.4 mm and 0.07 ± 0.23 mm respectively.Conclusion: The narrow diameter implant is a reliable implant treatment that can be used in patients with problems with tooth loss. The success rate between the NR line and the slim lines implant was not significantly different and was clinically acceptable.

Keywords
Narrow diameter implant
Implant
Mini implant
References
1
Kim HK, Lee EY, Kim JJ. Five-year retrospective radiographic follow-up study of dental implants with sandblasting with large grit, and acid etching-treated surfaces. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2015; 41: 317-321.
10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.6.31726734558PMC4699932
2
Jun-Yu Shi, Feng-Yuan Xu, Long-Fei Zhuang et al. Long-term outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws: A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 76-81.
10.1111/clr.1304628845539
3
Mohammed Alrabiah. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Clin Dent. 2018; e12367.
10.1111/jicd.1236730414262
4
Eik Schiegnitz, Bilal Al-Nawas. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29(Suppl. 16): 21-40.
10.1111/clr.1327230328192
5
Marcello-Machado RM, Faot F, Schuster AJ, et al. Mini-implants and narrow diameter implants as mandibular overdenture retainers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 161-183.
10.1111/joor.1258529125652
6
Degidi M, Piattelli A, Carinci F. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: a retrospective study of 510 implants. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 49-54.
10.1902/jop.2008.07024818166092
7
Chia-Yun Tsai, Ching-Fang Tsai, Yu-Chuan Tseng et al. Application of narrow-diameter implant in a limited space. J Dent Sci. 2010; 5: 114-120.
10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60016-5
8
Hallman M. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: Result after 1 year of loading. Int. J Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2001; 16: 731-736.
9
Schiegnitz E., Al-Nawas B., Kammerer PW et al. Oral rehabilitation with dental implants in irradiated patients: A meta-analysis on implant survival. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18: 687-698.
10.1007/s00784-013-1134-924271500
10
Walter C., Al-Nawas, B., Wolff et al. Dental implants in patients treated with antiresorptive medication - a systematic literature review. Int J Implant Dent. 2016; 2: 9.
10.1186/s40729-016-0041-727747701PMC5005701
11
Sarra Jawad, Craig Barclay, William Whittaker et al. A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating mini and conventional implant retained dentures on the function and quality of life of patients with an edentulous mandible. Jawad et al. BMC Oral Health. 2017; 17: 53.
10.1186/s12903-017-0333-128202072PMC5310054
12
Romeo E., Lops D., Amorfini, L et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 139-148.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01191.x16584409
13
Osvaldo Moraguez, Francesca Vailati, Linda Gr€utter, et al. Four-unit fixed dental prostheses replacing the maxillary incisors supported by two narrow-diameter implants - a five-year case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28: 887-892.
10.1111/clr.1289527325154
14
Jagjit S. Dhaliwal, Rubens F. Albuquerque. Jr, Monzur Murshed et al. Osseointegration of standard and mini dental implants; A histomorphometric comparison. Int J Implant Dent. 2017; 3: 15.
10.1186/s40729-017-0079-128462508PMC5411366
15
Marc O Klein, Elk Schiegnitz, Bilal Al-Nawas. Systemic review on success of narrow-diameter dental Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29: 43-54.
10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.324660189
16
Avinash S. Bidra, Khalid Almas. Mini implants for definitive prosthodontic treatment: A systemic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 156-164.
10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60035-9
17
Marco Degidi, Adriano Piattelli, Francesco Carinci. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter Implants: A retrospective study of 510 Implants. J Periodontol. 2008; 79: 49-54.
10.1902/jop.2008.07024818166092
18
Paolo Vigolo, Andrea Givani, Zeina Majzoub, et al. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: A 7-year retrospective studu. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 703-709.
19
Bae MS, Heo JU, Park JS, et al. Immediate provisionalization using one-piece narrow diameter implants for restoration of edentulous narrow spaces: Case reports. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 35: 276-279.
20
Paolo Vigolo, Andrea Givani. Clinical Evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: A five-year retrospective strudy. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84: 50-54.
10.1067/mpr.2000.10767410898842
21
Malo P, de Arujo Nobre M. Implants(3.3mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: A retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up. Clin Implants Res. 2011; 13: 95-103.
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00188.x19681926
22
Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M et al. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100: 422-431.
10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60259-0
23
Ding X, Zhu XH, Liao SH et al. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18: 393-402.
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00453.x19374710
24
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25.
25
Sohn DS, Bae MS, Heo JU et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of immediate provisionalization using one-piece narrow-diameter(3.0 mm) implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26: 163-168.
26
Arisan V, Bolukbasi N, Ersanli S et al. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: A clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 296-307.
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01840.x20443792
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 23
  • No :3
  • Pages :138-148
  • Received Date : 2019-02-13
  • Revised Date : 2019-09-04
  • Accepted Date : 2019-09-19
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.2019011
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close