All Issue

2018 Vol.22, Issue 1 Preview Page

Review Article

Review of Computer-assisted Implant Surgeries: Navigation Surgery System vs. Computer-guided Implant Template vs. Robot

컴퓨터-보조 임플란트 수술에 대한 고찰: 네비게이션 수술 시스템 vs. 컴퓨터가이드 임플란트 템플릿 vs. 수술 로봇

Ji-Man Park1*
,
Jongyub Kim2
,
June-Sung Shim1
박 지만1*
,
김 종엽2
,
심 준성1
1Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University
2Boston SMart Dental Clinic
1연세대학교 치과대학 보철과학교실
2보스톤스마트치과의원
*Corresponding Author. 
March 2018. pp. 50-58
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

In addition to the computer-guided implant template popularized in Korea recently, the navigation system and early-stage robot are becoming the new trend in the field of computer-assisted implant surgery. The navigation surgery system tracks the position of patient and handpiece and displays them in real-time on CT data with pre-implant planning. The purpose of this article is to describe the operation principle and method, the advantages and disadvantages, and the accuracy studies of the navigation system.

Keywords
Dental implant
Computer-assisted surgery
Navigation surgery
Computer-guided implant template
Robot

References
1
FortinT, ChamplebouxG, BianchiS, BuatoisH, CoudertJL. Precisionoftransferofpreoperativeplanning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan imagesthrough a robotic drilling machine. Clin OralImplantsRes. 2002; 13: 651-656.
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130612.x12519341
2
Azarmehr I, Stokbro K, Bell RB. Thygesen T. Surgical Navigation: A Systematic Review of Indications, Treatments, andOutcomesinOral andMaxillofacialSurgery. JOralMaxillofacSurg. 2017; 75: 1987-2005.
10.1016/j.joms.2017.01.00428193444
3
BlockMS, EmeryRW. StaticorDynamicNavigationforImplantPlacement-ChoosingtheMethodof Guidance. JOralMaxillofacSurg. 2016; 74: 269-277.
10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.02226452429
4
Casap N, Nadel S, Tarazi E, Weiss EI. Evaluation of a navigation system for dental implantation as a toolto train novice dental practitioners. JOralMaxillofacSurg. 2011; 69: 2548-2556.
10.1016/j.joms.2011.04.02621821328
5
CollyerJ. Stereotactic navigation in oral and maxillofacialsurgery. BrJ Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 48: 79-83.
10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.04.03720061072
6
WexlerA, TzadokS, CasapN. Computerized navigation surgery forthe safe placement of palatalimplants. AmJOrthodDentofacialOrthop 2007;131:S100-105.
10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.01617448382
7
Casap N, Tarazi E, Wexler A, Sonnenfeld U, Lustmann J. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flaplessimplantsurgery and immediate loading in the edentulousmandible. IntJOralMaxillofac Implants 2005;20:92-98.
15747679
8
Casap N, Wexler A, Persky N, Schneider A, Lustmann J. Navigation surgery for dental implants: assessmentofaccuracyoftheimageguidedimplantologysystem. JOralMaxillofacSurg. 2004; 62: 116-119.
10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.02815332188
9
FarleyNE, KennedyK, McGlumphyEA, ClellandNL. Split-mouthcomparisonofthe accuracyof computer-generatedandconventionalsurgicalguides. IntJOralMaxillofacImplants. 2013; 28: 563-572.
10.11607/jomi.302523527361
10
SarmentDP, SukovicP. ClinthorneN. Accuracyofimplantplacementwithastereolithographicsurgical guide. IntJOralMaxillofac Implants. 2003; 18: 571-577.
12939011
11
BlockMS, EmeryRW, LankK. Ryan J. ImplantPlacementAccuracyUsingDynamicNavigation. Int JOralMaxillofac Implants. 2017; 32: 92-99.
10.11607/jomi.500427643585
12
Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, Gibbs JD. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-BasedEvaluation. JOralImplantol. 2016; 42: 399-405.
10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-0002527267658
13
EggersG, PatellisE, MuhlingJ. Accuracyoftemplate-baseddentalimplantplacement. IntJOralMaxillofac Implants. 2009; 24: 447-454.
19587866
14
Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, HirschE, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, et al. Accuracy ofimplant placement based on pre-surgical planning ofthree-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. JClinPeriodontol. 2007; 34: 816-821.
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01110.x17716317
15
Fortin T, Bosson JL, CoudertJL, Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided systemfor oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. IntJ OralMaxillofac Implants. 2003; 18: 886-893.
14696665
16
Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implantsurgery: a clinical and radiographic study. IntJOralMaxillofac Implants .2009; 24: 234-242.
19492638
17
Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spuntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splintsystems. ClinOralImplantsRes. 2008; 19: 709-716.
18492085
18
CasapN, WexlerA, EliasharR. Computerized navigation forsurgery ofthe lowerjaw: comparison of 2 navigation systems. JOralMaxillofacSurg. 2008; 66: 1467-1475.
10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.27218571032
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회
  • Journal Title :Implantology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한구강악안면임플란트학회지
  • Volume : 22
  • No :1
  • Pages :50-58
  • Received Date : 2018-03-23
  • Revised Date : 2018-03-27
  • Accepted Date : 2018-03-31
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180005
Journal Informaiton Journal of implantology and applied sciences Journal of implantology and applied sciences
Online Submission & Review System
  • NRF
  • 임플란트학회 전용 배너
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close